Ingenic Launches Newton2: MIPS based IoT and Wearables Solution

The wearables and IoT market are moving very quickly, and only seven months after announcing their Newton platform, Ingenic is following up with Newton2. This pace reminds me of the glory days of consumer graphics cards, when NVIDIA and ATI were clawing for market share and would each produce two large launches per year. While the PC (and even smartphone) market has matured to a slower pace, the wearables and IoT market is currently quite frenetic. Dozens of companies worldwide are attempting to cash in on the explosive growth potential. Over time, we will see consolidation as contenders are crowned champions, but who those champions will be is anyone’s guess at the moment.

Ingenic is a relatively low profile company that could use an introduction. Ingenic is focused on semiconductors and devices and was founded in Beijing, China in 2005. Ingenic has licensed the MIPS architecture and designs their own CPU core and SoCs, and those designs are popular in low-end products such as digital picture frames, portable media players, and GPS devices. Ingenic had its IPO in 2011 and currently has a market cap of roughly $550 million.

Before getting to the details of Newton2, it’s important to understand positioning. Unlike other competitors, Ingenic positions the Newton (and Newton2) platform not as reference designs but instead as complete solutions. Ingenic would love to simply sell you the entire module as-is in high volume. However, Ingenic will build customized versions if you buy enough of them. This is similar to the Original Device Manufacturer (ODM) model, but in this case Newton is not an entire device but simply the electronics module. The purchaser still needs to place it into a full-fledged device like a smart watch or refrigerator. While Ingenic will sell you its custom designed SoCs as well, I am sure they would rather sell Newton as the margins for an integrated platform are guaranteed to be higher.

Now to the details. The Newton2 platform is a highly integrated module. These types of electronics are often referred to as a System on Module or SOM. Newton2 integrates the necessities of a wearable or IoT device, such as several built-in sensors and connectors for optional or obviously external components such as a display. Both Newton and Newton2 contain full featured application processors and can run Android.

Power consumption for Newton is 4mW standby, 100mW average, and 260mW peak. Newton2 claims to cut standby consumption to 3mW.

The SoC on Newton2 is entirely new, the Ingenic M200. Notable inclusions in M200, beyond the bevy of traditional functionality, are the LCD and E-Ink display controllers, voice trigger processing offload, and the M200 SoC.

Keep in mind that not every M200 interface is exposed on the Newton2. For example, accessing all five UARTs would require integrating the M200 into your own custom board.

The CPUs inside the M200 SOC set this SOM apart. The M200 integrates two custom designed Ingenic XBurst1 processors using the MIPS32 Release 2 ISA and include floating point and SIMD. Each processor is a full applications processor (AP) with an MMU and caches. However, you can consider the M200’s CPUs heterogeneous as one CPU is performance optimized and operates at up to 1.2 GHz while the other is optimized for power consumption and runs at up to 300 MHz. This is something we have seen before from NVIDIA with their Tegra devices as well as ARM’s big.LITTLE, but it’s different than other wearable and IoT efforts where low power duties are handled by a simple microcontroller (MCU). Using two APs likely simplifies software development somewhat, even if they are different, as they aren’t as enormously different as an AP and an MCU.

Looking at the XBurst1 power consumption, these cores are significantly lower power than the Cortex-A5 which ARM specifies at 0.12 mW/MHz on the same 40nm LP process. Comparing these cores beyond their power consumption is outside the scope of this article, but it is worth pointing out because ARM is citing Cortex-A5 as their most power efficient wearable CPU.

The XBurst1 CPU core has been around since 2005, when Ingenic was founded. Ingenic revealed in 2013 it had purchased a MIPS64 license and was developing XBurst2 with design completion targeted at 2014. This will go hand in hand with Android 5.0 supporting MIPS64 ISA natively. Keeping with their roughly six month pace, it isn’t too farfetched to imagine a Newton3 platform sporting a MIPS64 XBurst2 with Android 5.0 launching in mid-2015.

Samsung Launches the Gear Circle in the U.S.

Samsung has announced the availability of their Gear Circle Bluetooth headphones in the United States. The Gear Circle is a pair of Bluetooth earbuds that are worn around the neck and can gently vibrate when a notification arrives. When not in use, they can be attached together and worn as a necklace of sorts. It also supports voice notifications and voice commands through Samsung’s S Voice software. Samsung promises up to nine hours of music playback and up to eleven hours of talk time. 

There are currently no details on pricing, but Samsung has stated that they are now available in black and blue at T-Mobile stores, and will be available at AT&T stores, Samsung.com, and Amazon.com later this month. A special white color will also be available through Best Buy.

Microsoft Launches Microsoft Health And The Microsoft Band

Today Microsoft launched a new platform called Microsoft Health, and to accompany this they are officially launching the long rumored health and fitness band, called, well, Microsoft Band. And to satisfy the new cross platform initiatives by the company, Microsoft Health is compatible with several fitness tracking services such as UP by Jawbone, MapMyFitness, MyFitnessPal, and Runkeeper. The Microsoft Band will be compatible with iOS, Android, and Windows Phone, which should satisfy most smartphone owners, and there is a Heath app available for each platform as well.

Microsoft Health is described as a cloud based service which can unite data from different health and fitness devices and services into a single secure location. This will allow a more holistic picture of your health and fitness activities to be monitored. Microsoft Health will track things such as steps, calories, heart rate, and other data, where it can then be analyzed by the Microsoft Intelligence Engine which will let the user know things such as which exercise they performed that burned the most calories during a workout, and how much restful versus restless sleep they are getting. Over time, and if you allow it access to more data, it will be able to extrapolate if eating breakfast helps you run faster, or if the number of meetings during a day impacts how you sleep, as examples. You can also opt in to connect Microsoft Health data with the already existing HealthVault to share your data with a medical provider. It is early days yet, but as a platform this seems to be where the health and fitness industry is heading. If you can get over the big brother aspects of having all of your movements and activities tracked, there may be some real insights gained in how your work, fitness, and leisure activities affect your health and wellbeing.

Microsoft is planning a steady release of information regarding Microsoft Health over the next while, including additional device and service partnerships and SDK availability.

It has long been rumored that Microsoft would re-enter the smart watch game, but over time the rumors morphed into a fitness band. The Microsoft Band is a smart band designed to be worn continuously, 24 hours a day. It includes 10 smart sensors for heart rate monitoring, calorie burn measurement, sleep quality tracking, and more. It will also include guided workouts which are curated by well-known fitness experts. In addition, it will provide some of the smart watch capabilities such as notifications as well as access to Cortana if you are connected to Windows Phone 8.1. The Microsoft Band is available starting October 30^th for $199 from the Microsoft Store.

The wearables market is certainly in its infancy, so it is exciting to see the different array of devices appearing. Whether the market will tolerate them has yet to be decided, but companies such as Fitbit have proven that there is certainly a market for the health and fitness band. Microsoft has a relatively affordable offering here which is both cross platform, and a capable smart device. Microsoft Health as a platform is the bigger play here. Allowing access from many vendors is a great way to get initial buy-in from users, and once the fitness data is up in the Microsoft Cloud, I am sure Microsoft is hoping to capture some of these users for their other cloud offerings.