Mushkin Reactor 1TB SSD Review

Silicon Motion has practically become the new SandForce. Almost every tier three manufacturer (i.e. one with no controller/firmware IP or NAND fab) has released an SM2246EN based drive in the past ten months and recently Silicon Motion scored two major tier one partners (namely Micron/Crucial and SanDisk) as well. To be honest, this hasn’t come as a surprise because the SM2246EN is a really solid controller with good performance and more importantly it’s been mostly issue free (which is something that cannot be said about SandForce). Mushkin’s Reactor combines the SM2246EN with Micron’s latest 128Gbit 16nm MLC NAND, and this is actually the first time we’ve encountered a non-Micron/Crucial SSD with Micron’s 16nm NAND. Read on to find out how the SM2246EN performs with Micron’s latest NAND!

Intel Launches SSD DC S3610 & S3710 Enterprise SSDs

Late last week Intel updated its enterprise SATA SSD lineup with the ‘Data Center’ DC S3610 and DC S3710. At the time of the announcement the details of what exactly had changed were rather scarce, but I just got off of the phone with Intel and have a better understanding of the announcement.

The S3610 and S3710 are based on Intel’s second generation SATA 6Gbps controller, which was first introduced in the high capacity (1.2TB & 1.6TB) and M.2 S3500 models a couple of months ago. Intel is keeping the specifics of the controller close to its chest and the only tidbit of info I was able to get out of Intel is that the new controller runs at a higher frequency, although Intel wouldn’t disclose the exact speed (for the record, the first generation controller runs at 400MHz in the S3500/S3700). My guess would be that the second generation controller is merely a die shrink with the architecture being very similar, which would allow a higher frequency without impacting the power consumption. I’m also thinking that the internal caches and the DRAM controller have been upgraded to enable the higher capacities. 

The S3710 replaces the popular S3700 and in addition to the controller the NAND has been switched from 64Gbit 25nm HET MLC to 128Gbit 20nm HET MLC (HET stands for High Endurance Technology, which is essentially Intel’s marketing term for eMLC). Despite the larger die (and hence slightly slower) NAND, the performance sees an upgrade from 76K random read IOPS to 85K and from 36K random write IOPS to up to 45K. The improvement is mostly due to the new controller, although Intel told me that there is also some NAND-level optimizations in the mix. The endurance remains at the same 10 drive writes per day for five years and as usual to enterprise drives there’s full power loss protection along with AES-256 encryption. Pricing comes in at ~$1.50 per gigabyte and the drive is already available.

The S3610 is a totally new series in between the S35xx and S37xx lineups and its differentiator is the three drive writes per day endurance (whereas the S35xx is rated at 0.35 DWPD and the S37xx at 10 DWPD). Similar to the S3710, the S3610 also uses 128Gbit 20nm HET MLC, but there’s a difference in the binning quality of the chips. Basically, the S3710 gets the best of the best dies with the highest endurance, while the S3610 gets the dies that don’t make the cut for the S3710 but are still very high quality. There’s a difference in over-provisioning levels too as the S3710 features a higher 30-40% over-provisioning with the S3610 having only 10-20% (in both models the exact over-provisioning depends on the capacity). Random write performance is quite a bit lower as well, but the S3610’s focus is in mixed rather than very write-intensive workloads where the S3710 is the best fit. Full power loss protection and AES-256 support are also present, similar to the rest of Intel’s enterprise SSD lineup. 

I made a quick table comparing Intel’s enterprise SATA SSDs after last week’s announcement. The S3500 will remain on the market as an entry-level product and it’s also the only one that comes in M.2 form factor. As usual, the performance and endurance scale with price, so the S3500 is mainly aimed for read-intensive workloads (e.g. media streaming), whereas the S3610 and S3710 provide the necessary performance and endurance for mixed and write-intensive workloads respectively. 

Intel hasn’t sampled the S3610 and S3710 yet, but we hope to get samples soon and we’ll be able to put the new drives through our own tests.

Testing USB 3.1: Some Preliminary Results with the MSI X99A Gaming 9 ACK

Everyone wants more. Everyone wants more storage space, faster access, cheaper costs. It should have been here yesterday, but we are restrained at the current rate of development which sometimes moves in strides or sometimes does the 1-2 quickstep. Fo…